This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ehri, L. C. Articles by Willows, D. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis

City University of New York Graduate Center

Steven A. Stahl

University of Georgia

Dale M. Willows

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto

A quantitative meta-analysis evaluating the effects of systematic phonics instruction compared to unsystematic or no-phonics instruction on learning to read was conducted using 66 treatment-control comparisons derived from 38 experiments. The overall effect of phonics instruction on reading was moderate, d = 0.41. Effects persisted after instruction ended. Effects were larger when phonics instruction began early (d = 0.55) than after first grade (d = 0.27). Phonics benefited decoding, word reading, text comprehension, and spelling in many readers. Phonics helped low and middle SES readers, younger students at risk for reading disability (RD), and older students with RD, but it did not help low achieving readers that included students with cognitive limitations. Synthetic phonics and larger-unit systematic phonics programs produced a similar advantage in reading. Delivering instruction to small groups and classes was not less effective than tutoring. Systematic phonics instruction helped children learn to read better than all forms of control group instruction, including whole language. In sum, systematic phonics instruction proved effective and should be implemented as part of literacy programs to teach beginning reading as well as to prevent and remediate reading difficulties.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Amtmann, R. D. Abbott, and V. W. Berninger Identifying and Predicting Classes of Response to Explicit Phonological Spelling Instruction During Independent Composing J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2008; 41(3): 218 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Menzies, J. N. Mahdavi, and J. L. Lewis Early Intervention in Reading: From Research to Practice Remedial and Special Education, April 1, 2008; 29(2): 67 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Cummins Pedagogies for the Poor? Realigning Reading Instruction for Low-Income Students With Scientifically Based Reading Research Educational Researcher, December 1, 2007; 36(9): 564 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Borman, R. E. Slavin, A. C. K. Cheung, A. M. Chamberlain, N. A. Madden, and B. Chambers Final Reading Outcomes of the National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 44(3): 701 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Ehri, L. G. Dreyer, B. Flugman, and A. Gross Reading Rescue: An Effective Tutoring Intervention Model for Language-Minority Students Who Are Struggling Readers in First Grade American Educational Research Journal, June 1, 2007; 44(2): 414 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Burke and S. Hagan-Burke Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Early Literacy Indicators for Middle of First Grade Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 32(2): 66 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. F. Vadasy, E. A. Sanders, and J. A. Peyton Paraeducator-Supplemented Instruction in Structural Analysis With Text Reading Practice for Second and Third Graders at Risk for Reading Problems Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2006; 27(6): 365 - 378. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. W. Berninger, R. D. Abbott, K. Vermeulen, and C. M. Fulton Paths to Reading Comprehension in At-Risk Second-Grade Readers J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2006; 39(4): 334 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hagan-Burke, M. D. Burke, and C. Crowder The Convergent Validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency for the Beginning of First Grade Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2006; 31(4): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Kavale Identifying Specific Learning Disability: Is Responsiveness to Intervention the Answer? J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2005; 38(6): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Speece and K. D. Ritchey A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Oral Reading Fluency in Young Children At Risk for Reading Failure J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2005; 38(5): 387 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. F. Vadasy, E. A. Sanders, and J. A. Peyton Relative Effectiveness of Reading Practice or Word-Level Instruction in Supplemental Tutoring: How Text Matters J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2005; 38(4): 364 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. W. Berninger, A. Dunn, S.-J. C. Lin, and S. Shimada School Evolution: Scientist Practitioner Educators Creating Optimal Learning Environments for All Students J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2004; 37(6): 500 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Bhattacharya and L. C. Ehri Graphosyllabic Analysis Helps Adolescent Struggling Readers Read and Spell Words J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2004; 37(4): 331 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Xue and S. J. Meisels Early Literacy Instruction and Learning in Kindergarten: Evidence From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study--Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999 American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 191 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF]