Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McVee, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gavelek, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Schema Theory Revisited

Mary B. McVee

University at Buffalo/SUNY

Kailonnie Dunsmore

Calvin College

James R. Gavelek

University of Illinois at Chicago

During the 1970s, schema theory gained prominence as reading researchers took up early work by cognitive scientists to explore the role of schemas in reading. In the 1980s and ’90s, the field shifted as researchers increasingly used sociocultural theories, particularly the work of L. S. Vygotsky, to frame investigations of literacy. This article provides a brief review of schema theory as situated in literacy studies. The authors review various conceptions of schema theory to consider how recent social and cultural perspectives might prompt reconsideration of schemas as transactional and embodied constructs. Concomitantly, they explore how earlier conceptions of schema theory may assist researchers in their articulation of concepts such as ideal and material tools and the role of activity in Vygotsky’s work. The article concludes with considerations of implications for future work.

Key Words: cognitive science • embodied • literacy • mediation • sociocultural

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 75, No. 4, 531-566 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543075004531


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
M. A. Zipprich, M. Grace, and S. A. Grote-Garcia
Building Story Schema: Using Patterned Books as a Means of Instruction for Students With Disabilities
Intervention in School and Clinic, May 1, 2009; 44(5): 294 - 299.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
M. E. Gredler
Of Cabbages and Kings: Concepts and Inferences Curiously Attributed to Lev Vygotsky (Commentary on McVee, Dunsmore, and Gavelek, 2005)
Review of Educational Research, June 1, 2007; 77(2): 233 - 238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
K. A. Krasny, M. Sadoski, and A. Paivio
Unwarranted Return: A Response to McVee, Dunsmore, and Gavelek's (2005) "Schema Theory Revisited"
Review of Educational Research, June 1, 2007; 77(2): 239 - 244.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
M. B. McVee, J. R. Gavelek, and K. L. Dunsmore
Considerations of the Social, Individual, and Embodied: A Response to Comments on "Schema Theory Revisited"
Review of Educational Research, June 1, 2007; 77(2): 245 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page